Symplectic ID:
1518120
Source:
Ora (Hyrax)
This is the preferred source?:
1
Last Synced with Symplectic:
Sunday, 31 May, 2026 - 20:23
DOI:
10.1080/17579961.2023.2245679
Publication Date:
Friday, 18 August, 2023
First Page:
390
Last Page:
410
Keywords:
law and emerging technology
artificial intelligence (AI)
legal personhood
autonomy
Editors list has been truncated:
Abstract:
Artificially intelligent machines are increasingly capable of accomplishing tasks that have until now been considered exclusively human abilities. One such task is the ability to invent. In 2021, an Australian court became the first court in the world to recognise an Artificially Intelligent system as the inventor in a patent application, raising the question of whether AI systems could be considered the responsible actor of their actions, instead of the human using the AI. This paper examines the question of autonomy: how the concept of autonomy underpins the granting of legal rights to humans, and whether it is justified to grant legal rights to AI systems that are autonomous. We propose that there are two distinct and separate concepts of autonomy, Person Autonomy and Machine Autonomy, and that this distinction can guide how the law should treat AI systems.
Publisher:
Taylor & Francis
ISSN:
1757-9961
Journal Title:
Law, Innovation and Technology
eISSN:
1757-997X
Volume:
15
Issue:
2
ID at Source:
uuid_6f48ea58-04ca-47c1-8cc3-69b60d9020b8
Publication Status:
Published
Open access:
Publication Date - Display month part?:
Publication Date - Display day part?:
SSO preference:
scro0547